Tuesday, October 30, 2012

Social welfare


This post start with Simpson's wisdom. Look at social welfare, most of them just gives people money, so called the "safety net", which protect people from being too poor. in some sense, it also encourage people, for give an illusion to people that they can be lazy.

i still remember an experience from UNICEF in Africa. Long time ago, around 1980s, a lot of civil conflicts or wars in africa and made people suffering. The emergency aid is sending food, water, medicine to them. However, even after the chaos, the societies cannot rebuild and UNICEF thinks, by sending food or medicine can help them, people can save themselves automatically. However, the plan run for decades but the people still suffering. what's wrong?? it is because the people don't have the skill to saving themselves. Many doctors went to Africa, but the death rate still high. it is not because the doctors did a poor jobs or not enough of doctors, it is because people don't know how to take care of personal hygiene. in chinese words, "touching the surface but not dealing with the root". Now, the policy was changed. They build schools, teaching people to drink clean water, telling them how to farm, etc. Within few years, people start to saving themselves, and become independent.

this story is similar to social welfare. by giving people money, you can save them for a while, but not for long. This philosophy applied to young adult. How about old people??

the best solution is that old people have saving. hm.... stop pension later...... people will do the best they could.......... teaching people....... learn by lesson..... medical care by government..... like police, firefighters .....  i lost my patient on typing... may be continuous later....

Thursday, October 11, 2012

Somethings about Science, story and human

science, I mean pure science, deals with matter, even biology is about cell, micro-organism or the ecology.

story, deal with relationship. if one thing is related with the others, there is a story. thus, a story on how the doomsday happens, how butterfly mate and travel, how nuclear matter formed and has several properties, how a supernovae exploded, how money flow through the economy, how the WWII begin, are stories.

however, not every story is interesting, I mean, interesting to human. take Hollywood movies, there must be human relationship inside a story. there are alot YouTube about matter's story. say, how to make a bicycle. it may be interesting for some people. but it is hard to imagine all YouTube are this kind of clips, only deal with matter, death things. Or even living thing without human, say how bee finds the way home.

I always wonder, is it possible to write a story, interesting to human, but does not have any human, or human feeling in part of it (as the lion king, wall-E).

in certain extend, being a scientist, most of the time is dealing with matter. however, it does not mean we can survive without interaction with human. sometimes, life is boring because it is dun, only on one thing but not others, it is like unbalanced diet.

in Chinese society, Chinese are so enjoy on human relationship, rather then matter. I am not sure other society. one reason is that, it is much closer to us, we have to cooperate, live with others. and that may be why Chinese never develop science. some say Chinese feels politics is dirty and avoiding it. I think it is just modern Chinese. Compare the history, Chinese take part in politics very much. but the lack of science, or the logical thinking,, we never break through the kingship and develop democracy.

Tuesday, August 21, 2012

A flaw of democracy

nowadays democracy is indirect, we elected someone to represent us in the council. even in general election, every people vote for themselves, we transfer some power to the representative, say, president.

during the election, candidates can imagine many things, can give a vision, an imagination to people, to "sell" themselves, to image themselves as the most suitable person.

however, there is no guarantee thy what they said will come true. this is the flaw of democracy, or more precise, the flaw of right transfer, the flaw of election.

in hk, there are many politic party, before the election, they publish their attitude on certain issues. Say, they support general election, extend the transparency of the government, etc. however, after they were elected, sit in the council tight, they take action totally opposite by objecting related bills, acts, etc..

not just in hk, I can see in Taiwan, every in US, candidates will say something they cannot do. Although in catholic country, there moral standard is higher then Chinese, they are more careful when talking about sensitive issue. however, the democracy is mean to wipe out the fluctuation on human moral standard. the best is minimum the effect on moral. of course, that does not mean we don't need a good moral of leaders.

so, may be, we require all elected candidates are required to their wealth to the failed candidates, or opposite party. When ever they do something violated what they said during election, their money will be donated to charity by the opposite party.

however, as the councillors are not sitting there forever, they have to face another election after the council was over. people will "remember" why they did and not voting those cheaters again. that seem to be a good counter action to regulate councillors. and who regulate the opposite party for donating the money??

but that may be not enough. What if someone, mean to do bad things and just want to be a councilor once?? he don't mean to be re-elected, but just want to do selfish thing?? moreover, people have to be a good memories to remember what they did in last few years. to be honest, it is hard to do!

I know this is not the best answer. the idea is that, they are immediate facing a drawback on violate promise. and they are always be watched by the opposite party, or even the media.

media can only make their image bad, but for those real evil, they don't care. there must be some way to regulate those are not honest. and make every candidates to say something real practical and realistic.





Monday, August 20, 2012

On the doubt about general election in hk

it is very surprising that, among those well educated teenagers or young adult , not to mention those older, believe that general election is not suitable in hk. their argument is that, hk people are not wise. people will elected some idiot and make bad policy.

for those, I always tell them an analogy:

If you go to a resteraunt, you chooses some shit, you can order something else next time, if your dishes with a cockroach, you can change it! however, if you were forced to eat some shit, you have no choice and have to eat it day by day!

it think it is very obvious. if we make mistake, we can learn. but someone make us have a bad day, what can we do? ok, we can fight back. but it is not a good or easy way.

another analogy I would like to tell the
is:

a fresh graduate always faces a problem on Jon hunting - experience required. everybody complain about this. I need to have some experience to have some experience? take a time machine? something apply to general election. people cannot say, since this city never have experience on election thus, we may do it wrong, so better wait until we are more "wise", more "experienced". I think it is totally bullshit. I bet that no parent will tell their kid don't learn to walk, since you have no experience, you will fall an be injured, you better crow for your whole life.

After I told this to may friend, they suddenly realized that "not wise" enough is not the reason for not having a general election. it is just the power-holder don't want to share the power, coz no matter how deep shit they made, they are not the one who suffer.

I hope this idea will well spread among the hk public.

one more thing, people will also argue that, many people were blindly supporting china interference on hk issue. but I think, as long as they are hk people, live in hk, they also suffer from bad policy. through general election, people will discuss, talk, and educate each other. by time to time, only the goo will pop out.

Saturday, August 11, 2012

自嘲

古典瞬間:自嘲是一種高級幽默



孔子是善於自嘲的大師級人物,他在鄭國與弟子們走散,獨自在東門外彷徨。子貢到處找老師,有一個人告訴他說:「東門外站著一個人,看上去就像喪家之犬的那位,是不是你的老師啊?」子貢找到孔子並且轉述了那人的話,孔子苦笑著說他形容得傳神:「是啊,我確實像條喪家之犬啊!」

 孔子在亂世之中到處遊說,到處碰壁,尷尬又沮喪。他能認識到這一點,說明他是十分自知的。看來,自嘲的第一要素,就是要有自知之明。

 魏晉文人劉伶是喝酒的高手,也是自嘲的高手。劉伶醉酒之後,並非如死豬一般酣睡,他能妙語如珠,令人莞爾。他瘦小乾巴,其貌不揚,有次喝醉酒之後,與人發生衝突,那人捋出袖子伸出拳頭準備「修理」劉伶,劉伶也把衣服撩起來,不過他不是來動武的,他露出猙獰可數的一排排肋骨,慢條斯理地說:「你看看,我這雞肋骨上有您放拳頭的地方嗎?」那人大笑著離開了。劉伶及時的自嘲,有四襾撥千斤之效,不但免了一頓皮肉之苦,還留傳下來一段佳話。

 自嘲還需有開闊的胸襟墊底。因為胸襟開闊的人,一般都比較幽默,而幽默的一條重要原則,就是寧可取笑自己,絕不輕易取笑別人。自嘲,是自知、自娛和自信的表現,是一種高級幽默。

 宋朝詩人石曼卿,氣宇軒昂,詩酒豪放。有一次,石曼卿乘馬,馬伕一時失控,馬受驚疾走,曼卿墮馬落地,摔得不輕,馬伕嚇得要命,但他慢悠悠對馬伕說:「幸虧我是石學士,如果是瓦學士的話,豈不早被摔碎啦?」

 最近看到兩則墓誌銘,寫得特別風趣、充滿自嘲。一位是書法家啟功,他66歲時自撰墓誌銘。銘文曰: 中學生,副教授。博不精,專不透。名雖揚,實不夠。高不成,低不就。癱趨左,派曾右。面微圓,皮欠厚。妻已亡,並無後。喪猶新,病照舊。六十六,非不壽。八寶山,漸相湊。計平生,謚曰陋。身與名,一齊臭。

 還有一位是著名戲劇家翁偶虹,他在一九九三年不幸病逝。這篇《自志銘》是翁先生生前對自己一生的總結:是讀書種子,也是江湖伶人。也曾粉墨塗面,也曾朱墨為文。甘作花虱於菊圃,不厭蠹魚於書林。書破萬卷,只青一衿;路行萬里,未薄層雲。寧俯首於花鳥,不折腰於縉紳。步漢卿而無珠簾之影,儀笠翁而無玉堂之心。看破實未做,作幾番閒中忙叟;未歸反有歸,為一代今之古人。

 詩人北島說,依他看,沒有多少中國文人懂得自嘲,故非重即輕。我的理解是,自嘲的輕重很難把握,自嘲過輕,如隔靴搔癢,有矯情之嫌,而自嘲過重,將自己貶得一錢不值,又近於自輕與自賤了。啟功的「身與名,一齊臭」,有些言重,翁偶虹的自嘲恰如其分,「寧俯首於花鳥,不折腰於縉紳」,大概也是所有擅長自嘲的文人最本質的底蘊。

 因為職業的原因,文人常常受到各種攻訐,文人選擇自嘲,潛意識裡就有這樣的心理:我自己早就嘲笑過甚至「自輕」過自己了,你再處心積慮地挖苦我,又有什麼勁?

 如賈平凹禿頂,他說到禿頂的好處,其中第二條就是「沒小辮可捉」,真是絕妙的一語雙關,而其他諸如省洗理費、能知冷知曬、有虱子一眼就能看到、隨時準備上戰場、像佛一樣慈悲為懷、不會被削髮為民、怒而髮不沖冠等,無一不透著「聰明絕頂」的高級幽默。

How much my parents spent on me on schooling (so far)

recently, it said it required 5millions HKD for a child to properly study in HK education system. it is all bull shit. if we put this as investment, that mean most HK parents are not a efficacious investor, who spend a lot of money in cheap stock.

i asked my parents about how mush they spent on me:

kindergarten 3 years:  my mom forgot the exact number, but she said not more then 10k a years
Primary school 6 years:  free, only on textbook, from 1000 HKD a year to 2000 HKD a year.
Secondary School 7 years:  free from 1st year to 3rd years. then 500 HKD a month. text book is around 2000 a year.
University 3 years:   Free from grand from government, (~ 120k, living cost borrow from government. )
Graduate school (M. Phil) 2.5 years: 105k
Graduate school (Ph.D) 3 years : 0
Extracurricular activities:
          Swimming (age 6 to 9): many be 3000 HKD in total
          Martial Art (1 years): few hundred, say 500 HKD
          Judo (1 year ): ~ 500HKD
          Tutorial (english, 0.5 year) : ~ 2000 HKD in total
          Graduation trip (to Europe for 1.5 month ) : ~ 50k

Total : 238k < 240k HKD

compare to the "rich" educations ~ 5000k, my parent only spent about 5%.

in my opinion, if thinking children education is an investment, thus, parent spend so much is bad investor.

the important of education is critical thinking, think analytically. not remember a lot of facts, rules. i mean, of course finally we have to know such thing and remember them,  but it is not the goal.

in chinese, about 2500 years before, there is a famous book, called "way of learning" or "the university" (大學), in there, already wrote a famous quote

       comparing with criticizing and analysing is the way of knowing. 致知在格物




Friday, July 27, 2012

2 rooks or a Queen?

This is a very controversial question. People posted a lot of discussions on the issue. Basically, it is quite a personal favor and depends on great varieties of the chessboard.

let's just assume there are 2 rooks and a Queen, all pawns are stripped. my opinion is, the queen attack direction is a point source, but 2 rooks can be from totally difference direction(row an columns). The total square covered by a Queen is 7x4+1=29, which is 45% of the board. the 2 rooks, if they are not covering each other, it can cover at almost 7x4-2+2=28, a little smaller. If the 2 rooks are on the same row or column, the covered area reduced to 22, 7 squares lesser, which almost a row. however, since the tools are covered each other, they are not threaten by the queen any more. while a single queen movement is truly restricted.

in order I checkmate, the Queen has to work together with the King. the only way to checkmate is the King pushing the other King in close range. in case of 2 rooks, the checkmate can be done by theirs own as long as they are not on same file. thus, If the queen can forcing the rooks on same files and moving her king toward the other king. possible checkmate.

this is an ideal case, since the 2 rooks can also get help from their king to not occupy the same file by staying close to their king. this also proving a castle for the king to avoid check and forcing draw.

now, we think about checking and avoiding checking in the queen side. to check the queen's king, the rooks have to put on the same file of the king. if the queen is on the same file of the king, the number of possible checking square is 5 for a single rook. for 2 rooks, as they are not threaten by the queen, they can always check, either directly or behind the queen. in fact, the Queen should be avoid to stay on the same file with her king, otherwise, a pinning will loss the queen! thus, the danger square of the queen or the effective cover area of 2 rooks is 28.

In the 2 rooks side, their king can be attacked from any direction if the rook are far away. however, when the rooks are near, the possible attack direction reduced to 1.

OK, i am tried. the last thing we should think about is the possibly of forking a single rook.  

Thursday, July 19, 2012

logic 101 (class 3, set)

Somehow, "half-knowledge (mis-understood) is more dangerous then foolish". it is because, people like to guess the non-told part, or be confused for the non-told. lets go deeper into logic.

before, lets go back to a fundamental thing : set.

    set is a group of objects

for example, a family is a set, it contains family members. the stuffs on a desk form a set. the people in a country form a set. nevertheless, there is an empty set. say, the tree in Antarctica. Thus, by naming the common property of some objects or a rule on selection, we have a set. in reverse, all elements in a set share some common properties or rules.
among a set, there may be some "sub-set", say, the kids in a family, the women in a country. this concept should be easily be understood. 

To get the feeling of set, we usually draw a picture. the area inside a circle represent a set, and another circle inside the circle represent a sub-set.


Now, we have to introduce 2 simple concepts: AND and OR

     AND : the common objects in 2 or more sets.
     OR : any thing in 2 or more sets

in a picture, AND is the common area of 2 circles. OR is the total area of 2 circles. We should be very careful that, in logic, the OR has only 1 meaning. but in human language, which also follow some logic, "or" can be mean "either A or B, but not both", or "either A or B or both." 

the application of it is very powerful. say, we have a set of  "what to do in raining", thus, we have many elements inside, say, "bring umbrella" , "stay indoor", etc. If we draw a circle A of  "what to do in raining", the circle B of "bring umbrella" is another circle that cross circle A. and "stay indoor" also another circle crossing A but never touch B. 

what does it means?? it mean that, there are some are of B, which is not lay in A. thus, when someone bring an umbrella, it does not mean it is raining! we just illustrated the logic why "If A then B" and "if B then A" are not equal by graph!! 

and we can see, the circle B and C don't touch each other, which mean, when we stay home, we never bring umbrella and vice versa. then we have a logic, 

    if B then not C   equal   if C then not B

ok, Now, we introduce "a universal set", which contain everything we are concerning. (it is not the set of everything, which does not exist.) we draw a rectangle which contain every circles.;thus, the area OUTSIDE  a circle mean "not this circle". in our example, "not C" is outside the circle C.

thus, we can see, B is a subset of not C. and we have a very important concept.

   if A then B  equal    set A is a sub-set of B

OK, lets apply on our case. we immediately see some problem that, circle A is not a subset of circle B! how come?  this mean, our logic has problem. we missing an assumption that, we have to add a circle D, "out-door". i will let reader think about where the "shape" (not circle may be) should be placed.


Tuesday, July 17, 2012

logic 101 (class 2)

i just posted about logic yesterday, and i saw one logic error in facebook today. (facepalm)

let put it in here,

    man cannot change destiny, but personality can change it. 

it seems OK, right. lets just don't discuss what is "destiny" in here, and i reply the post by asking,

   can man change his personality?

by i asking this question is that, the sentence indicated that "man" and "his personality" are independent. and this is natural to ask that "what defined the personality?" it can be anything but "man", say, weather, horoscope, etc. i just want to clarify that. If man cannot change his personality, then the so call "destiny" is really out of man control. and we are all helpless in front of "destiny", like a chess piece.

my friend replied,

  man definite can change his personality.

thus, we can see, "man can change destiny", which contradicted to the statement. because by associative law, we have

   man definite can change his personality.
   personality can change destiny.
   thus, man can change destiny
   but, man cannot change destiny !
   Contradiction!!



Now, we can understand the contradiction, which can be symbolic into.

    Given B, if A then not B.


Monday, July 16, 2012

logic 101

i planned to write about logic for public long time ago. coz i saw many people made logic mistake during debates and arguments, especially more and more people joined discussions on public issues. And never the less, the new HK chief executive always using "double negation" statement, or logic, to fool people around.

here i will give a fundamental logic with minimum mathematical jargon, hope people from any background will understand it easily.

***************

first rule of logic is, we only talk about something that can be proved to be right or wrong. Expressing a feeling is not part of logic.

   Eunice is beautiful. <-- this is not a logical statement, since it cannot be right or wrong.

   Bill Gate is rich. <--- this is a logical statement, since we can prove Bill Gate is rich or not. of course this can also be an expression of feeling.


Most people understand the  conclusive logic.

    if A has property B  and C is part of A, then C has property B.

an example is : All human will die, John is a human, then John will die. a little explanation is, C is part of A. if C is not part of A, then the logic fail. an example is, i like apple, i am human, then human likes apple. obviously, we know that NOT all human likes apple!

we can generalized the logic as

   if A then B

which mean, A will cause B, expressing a relationship/consequence. for example, if my cell phone run out of battery, then i could not use the phone.


Most people can use associative law very easily:

     if A then B and B then C, then A then C.

an example is, if i work hard, then high score in exam, and if high score in exam, my parent happy. then, if i work hard, then my parent happy.

Now, a common mistake made by people is

  if A then B = if B then A

let me give an example of this mistake. if it is raining, Mary will bring an umbrella. OK, when we saw Mary bring an umbrella, some people will say, "oh, it must be raining." or, if it is not raining, then people will ask Mary, "why do you bring umbrella?"

i see this mistake happen very common. another example is. If i respect a teacher, he is a good teacher. and what if i don't respect a teacher? is it mean he is a bad teacher? NO, i simple Didn't Say anything when i not respect a teacher!

take the example of raining. we now know that if it is raining, Mary will bring an umbrella. But how about it is sunny, what Mary will bring? WE DON"T KNOW! Mary can bring anything or nothing, we just don't know.

let make a clear illustration here. we have 4 possible combination of A, B, not A , not B.

   a) if A then B
   1) if not A then not B
   2) if not B then not A
   3) if B then A

we now should be clear that, a) is not equal to 3). and 1) is simple wrong, or we cannot know by just given a). How about 2)???

Now, this is what i want to let everyone know.

    a) = 2) | if A then B = if not B then A

using if it is raining, Mary will bring an umbrella as an example. we now sure that, if Mary does not bring an umbrella, then it is not raining. we see here a double negation statement, which make many people confused.

so, to clear things, here is a conclusion.

if we given a statement, we can only know 1 extra things. and ask 2 questions to make sure we understood.

    if A then B  =  if  not B then not A
    1) what if not A ??
    2) what if B ??

Sunday, July 15, 2012

美國知名智褲蘭德公司的報告 ---:美國智庫對中國人的15條評論

轉貼.........美國知名智褲蘭德公司的報告 ---:美國智庫對中國人的15條評論
(值得兩岸中國人深思與警惕)

1. 中國人缺乏誠信和社會責任感。中國人不瞭解他們作為社會個體應該對國家和社會所承擔的責任和義務。普通中國人通常只關心他們的家庭和親屬,中國的文化是建立在家族血緣關係上而不是建立在一個理性的社會基礎之上。中國人只在乎他們直系親屬的福祉,對與自己毫不相關的人所遭受的苦難則視而不見。毫無疑問,這種以血緣關係為基礎的道德觀勢必導致自私,冷酷,這種自私和冷酷已經成為阻礙中國社會向前發展的最關鍵因素。

2. 中國從來就沒有成為一個法制社會,因為中國人的思維方式與守法行為格格不入。中國人老想走捷徑。他們不明白這樣一個事實:即成就來自於努⋯⋯力工作和犧牲。中國人傾向於索取而不是給予。他們需要明白一個道理:生活的真諦不在於你索取多少而在於你能給予社會和你的人類同胞多少。

3. 大多數中國人從來就沒有學到過什麼是體面和尊敬的生活意義。中國人普遍不懂得如何為了個人和社會的福祉去進行富有成效的生活。潛意識裡,中國人視他們的生活目的就是抬高自己從而獲得別人的認知。這樣一來,一個人就會對“保有面子”這樣微不足道慾望感到滿足。“面子”是中國人心理最基本的組成部分,它已經成為了中國人難以克服的障礙,阻礙中國人接受真理並嘗試富有意義的生活。這個應受譴責的習性使得中國人生來就具有無情和自私的特點,它已成為中國落後的主要原因。

4. 中國人沒有勇氣去追求他們認為正確的事情。首先,他們沒有從錯誤中篩選正確事物的能力,因為他們的思想被貪婪所佔據。再有,就算他們有能力篩選出正確的事情,他們也缺乏勇氣去把真理化為實踐。

5. 中國人習慣接受廉價和免費的事物,他們總是夢想奇跡或者好運,因為他們不願意付出努力,他們總想不勞而獲。很少有中國人明白一個事實:威望和成就是通過一步步努力的工作和犧牲實現的,不付出就沒有所得。簡單來說,如果是為了謀生,那一個人只有去索取;但如果是為了生活,一個人必須要去奉獻。

6. 由於在貧窮的環境下生長並且缺少應有的教育,大多數中國人不懂得優雅的舉止和基本的禮貌。他們中的大多數人著裝笨拙粗鄙卻不感到害羞。他們在青少年時所受的教育就是如何說謊並從別人那裡索取,而不是去與別人去分享自己的所有。

7. 中國是一個物產豐富的國家。但無限制生育政策所帶來惡果使得中國成為了無限廉價勞動力的輸出國。這些輸出也包括那些受過教育的勞力輸出,除了他們的教育水平,實則和其他一般苦力沒有本質上的區別。

8. 中國大規模生產的便宜產品降低了鍵入這些產品的地區的商業信用度。由於技術落後,管理失敗,中國製造的單位能耗要比發達國家如日本、美國高出很多。因此,隨著出口額的增加,中國在擴大生產的同時喪失著寶貴的能源。同時,這種行為也嚴重地污染了環境,使中國變為全世界最不適宜人類居住的國家。

9. 目前中國正在遭受著資本主義社會兩大邪惡的折磨,環境的破壞與人性的喪失。由於中國人天生的貪婪的本性,他們可以毫無保留的接受資本主義的陰暗面即無止境追求物質利益、忽視人的尊嚴。中國人對西方的技術與產品狂熱追求卻對西方管理文化所強調的坦率、直接、誠實這些品質漠不關心。

10. 由於中國文化不鼓勵敢於冒險這種優良品質 (??),所以中國人極力避免冒險,他們也不想尋求機會來改善自己的生活。中國人對於生活的平衡性和意義性並不感興趣,相反他們更執迷於對物質的索取,這點上要遠遠勝於西方人。大多數中國人發現他們不懂得“精神靈性”、“自由信仰”以及“心智健康”這樣的概念,因為他們的思想尚不能達到一個生命(補:即肉體和靈性的並存)存在的更高層次。他們的思想還停留在專注於動物本能對性和食物那點貪婪可憐的慾望上。

11. 在中國人的眼中,受教育不是為了尋求真理或者改善生活質量,而只是身份和顯赫地位的象徵和標誌。中國的知識分子從別人那裡得到尊敬並不是因為他們為了別人的幸福做過什麼,而只是因為他們獲得佔有了相當的知識。事實上,他們中的大多數只不過是一群僅僅通曉考試卻從不關心真理和道德的食客。

12.中國的教育體系很大程度上已經成為一種失敗和恥辱。它已經不能夠服務於教育本應所服務的對象:社會。這個教育體系不能提供給社會許多有用的個體。它只是製造出一群投機分子,他們渴望能夠受益於社會所提供的好處卻毫不關心回報。

13. 中國可以培養出大批的高級人才,但卻很少可以培養出合格的可以獨立主持的管理級專家。服務於一個公司或者社會,光有技術是不夠的;還需要有勇氣、膽量、正直和誠實的領導才能,這恰恰是大多數中國人所缺少的品性。正如亞瑟•史密斯(一位著名的西方傳教士)一個世紀前所指出的,中國人最缺乏的不是智慧,而是勇氣和正直的純正品性。這個評價,雖然歷經百年,如今依舊準確診斷出中國綜合症的原因。

14 .大多數中國畢業生對選擇出國並為外國工作不會感到內疚,事實上他們首先欠下了中國人民在教育上為他們所做出的犧牲。隨著傳統文化價值觀的破壞和逐步衰弱,大多數的中國人(包括受過教育的人)都徘徊在精神和內心世界的路口,像迷失的狗一樣不知何去何從。

15.……………………(最後一條留給我們的讀者)

Tuesday, June 12, 2012

桃花

桃花塢裡桃花庵,桃花庵下桃花仙。桃花仙人種桃樹,又摘桃花賣酒錢。

酒醒只在花前坐,酒醉還來花下眠。半醒半醉日復日,花落花開年復年。

但願老死花酒間,不願鞠躬車馬前。車塵馬足富者趣,酒盞花枝貧者緣。

若將富貴比貧賤,一在平地一在天。若將花酒比車馬,他得驅馳我得閒。

別人笑我太瘋癲,我笑別人看不穿。不見五陵豪傑墓,無花無酒鋤作田。

Sunday, April 08, 2012

If people are same as me

When i saw nokia commerical long time ago. People are all the same face. I wonder, what if all people are same as me.

First, I think all singers or movie stars are poor. i am not a fan for any one. In fact, I hate to be a fan of someone. Why I have to admire you just because you can sing a good song? I rather like to admire the song then the singer. Coz even a good singer can produces shit. and I really don't understand why people pay so expensive concert ticket to watch their star. for me, I rather spend those money with friends, family.

basketball, football etc will be gone. I just cannot understand why watching people doing that instead of playing the game by ourself. why people attach emotion feeling on something that is not belong, or not even not related to themselves? every time I watch a game with my friend, I just cannot sit but really want to play by myself. Ok, I think if people watching as a learning, may be fine with me.

apple will fall. I don't like apple's produce. Simple they are arrogance and "think" their way is the best, you "must" follow. It is same as technology Nazi for me. sadly enough, I am using my iPhone on typing this post.

Bookshop will be very popular, coz every people read.

ar, lost of concentration... May be continuous next day.

Friday, March 30, 2012

依然站在原地, 還是一無所有

年華老去 就在一瞬間
 時間飛快 不曾停下來
 像是在夢裡 無盡的夢裡 
像是一齣戲

 昨天的汗 留在臉頰上
 今天卻要 再用力呼吸
 急促的鼻息 何時才休息 
我快要不行

 所愛的人 早已經遠離
 所犯的錯 來不及反省
 來不及再見 跟妳說再見 原諒我好嗎

 瘋狂追逐 世上的所有
 擁有之後 還是不夠多
 浪費一輩子 才了解生命 才領悟真理

 為什麼 雙腳依然站在原地 又回到了起點
 原來 我什麼都沒有 一張失落的臉

 為什麼 雙手還是一無所有 在笑和淚之間
 是否 還想念你的臉


Saturday, March 24, 2012

Statistic in daily life

If you are curious enough, or criticize enough, may be, you will find that statistic is all around us. Especially, nowaday, doing a poll and get some statistic is very easy. how how to understand the number and the meaning behind, that may be, or i would say, no many people really know what does it mean.

 for example, in recently newspaper, geologist said that, there are 70% chance that Tokyo will have magnitude 8 or higher in next 4 years. it seems very easy to understand. but if i ask, what is the chance in coming year? i am afraid only few people can answer. and how about if there is none in next 4 years, what is the chance? will it increase or decrease? ok, that may sound only geologist will know.

there is many polls on public opinion, but how large is the voters is enough to represent the public? if a city has 1 million people, is a poll on 1000 people enough? moreover, some poll will show numbers, what is the error of those numbers? say, in the US president election, John has 45% and Mary has 41% support. if the error is 10%, than it is hardly to say John is winning. however, if the error is 0.1 %, John is definitely winning. OK, although in a real vote, there is no error, since all error vote will not be counted. but in any survey, there must be some error, just like any scientific measurement. and it is the survey, make social science becomes a science.

OK, the above example may be not very related to yourselves. how about medical researches or reports? say, in 1 test, your AIDS result is positive, does it mean you really have AIDS? because every tester, there is a blind point, which is called false positive or false negative. what about the test is a false positive? that totally chance your life. moreover, occasionally, some medical researches will say something like, an apple a day can reduce the chance for getting cancer by 50%. what is this 50%? if the chance of getting cancer is just 1%, from 1% to 0.5%, is that really a difference? ( a side track, that's why, in science research, we like to say how many order the result was improved, 1 order means 10 times, 2 orders means 100 times, that is more significant.)

anyway, i wish i have time to share these in future and talk about each by each.

cities i had been

on age 27 and half. i had been lived in some places. i am going to talk about the living and some personal feeling.

i spent most years in Hong Kong, where i growth up and start thinking. when i look back and compare, the public library system in HK is very good. libraries are big and easy to find. when compare to other places, may be HK is a small city, from east to west, 1 or 2 hours is ok, hk has high library density. a district is about few km square and each district must have a public library. i spent most time over there in my childhood. i must thank the libraries, which made me as a physicist.

HK is a small place. if someone ask me, what do i think about HK, i would say, it is getting worst. of course this comment is formed after i have chance to see other places and compare. anyway, after high school, i chose the physic major, not because i cannot chose other more money-making major but i truly love the beauty of nature rather then the colorful bills. But after that, i found there is a ending for a physics student in HK. there is so limited time to enjoy life as a physics student, that, after graduation, i have to find a job, all your learning in physics over the past years becomes a blank paper in your CV. the feeling is like a half-bake cake or an unfinished painting.

it is lucky that HK is an "international" city, which has many connection with outer world. i had been exchanged to Singapore for half year, although i am not a good student. i found that it totally changed my life. i met people, i improved my english, i know there is other options. Singapore is a smaller city. however, i still remember that it is a living city. the people are more simple and hardwork. some HK people may think they are dump, don't know how to by-pass the rules or do things in a quick way. but that is this nature, i like Singapore's people a lot. no to mention there "singlish". The student there is really serious. as far as i knew, no one copy homework but work together to understand concepts. Singapore is a business city, but it does not mean it is only business, there are many varieties. i think Singapore is a good city to live in. some people will complain that it is a boring city, not much to see. True, but the simple living style, and people can enjoy themselves without paying too much and rely too much on shopping mall, cinema, but stay in home, have family party, friend party. i think it is healthy.

the next city i like to talk about is Istanbul. it is an old city, before roman empire, this city is shinning between europe and east asia ( small asia). when walking on the road to the Tokapai palace, i can almost see the roman cavalry matching, the Sultan and his governors passing by. they all walked on the same road. the city is splitted into 3 parts by the Bosphorus. and is beautifully decorated by Camii. the people over there is ambition, and lividly. it is also a business city. that make people over there is really a good business man. and business always accomplish by meeting, dinning and touring. Moreover, Istanbul is the capital of Turkey, so, Turkish from every corners come to Istanbul. moreover, Russian, Greek, and middle east people also come to this city and make this city a truly diversify city. you can meet many people in istanbul. and turkish are all warm and friendly. you can always say hi to someone and start chatting. however, istanbul also a bit lost her direction on the future. i am not sure it is a good place for scientists, but it is a good place for business and living. one draw back is, english is not quite popular.

i only visit New York once, about 5 days. it is a truly a big apple. unlike HK and Signapore, New York has something extra, more art or humanity. people are diverse. yellow, white, black, brown, all you can find in this place. because many people from many difference culture, i can have real chinese food, not modified too much. not much can say, but i definitely like to live in there.

the last one i like to talk about is Tokyo. i already lived in here for 1 and half years. life is good, except food. Japanese food is good and high quality, but the variety is low. Although it is the biggest city in the world, not much people speak english. but japanese are very good with me. but due to language barrier, it is hard to know each other more. if i have time, i definitely will learn Japanese, seriously. The most lovely things in here is the season change. winter, snow, spring, sakura, summer, peach, autumn, red leaf.

will be continuous....

Friday, March 23, 2012

on 2012 HK's Chief Executive election

after the 2 debates, i suddenly realized that, CY. Leung is a bad guy. and YY.Tong is just simple and shy in public.

through out the debate, Leung's "looks" very confident. however, although he spoke alot, you barely know and remember what he has said. it is because he never show up himself, he is wearing a thick mask. every thing in public, he is well designed, well prepared that, it seem the only way you can react is listen to him, believe him. The thing is, people is hardly criticize or judge this guy. some people will say, "yes, this is the leadership." but i would say, " this is a dictatorship." because a good leader is not a "order-giver" but a bonding between each member, to communicate, and lead through understanding. A master in front of slave has no leadership.

Moreover, Leung's style on answering criticize questions about his plan is, "No, ......." then he explain. but i found that it is better use "imagine". he has many "theories" and he like to present himself as a social scientist, always said, "the fundamental problem is AAA, then if we change it, then BBB, if BBB is working, then CCC. so on and so on. " i feel like, "what? i knew my mother is a female. but that does not mean i must be born." i understand in a short time, it is hard to explain those things in detail. but the impression and the "strong believe" of his plan is "prefect" make me feel Nazi, or communism. the fear of a huge government and it control everything, even your mind. that's i strongly fear and oppose.

When look at Tong, after the debates, i found that he is only shy or not good in talking, especially in public. when talking on some issue, his reaction, respond is very good. and he is crystal transparent. we somehow understand who he is. he is a good guy. why? his motivation is usually very simple and easily understood. say, he is supported by tycoons, so his thinking is biased. see? how naive he is! on the issue about his "Illegitimate child", he said, " i won't talk about any thing about third people." i think he has a good heart. however, stupid and ill-logic HKer think he admitted he has.

anyway, there is no integrity among these 2 guys. Tong has many personal affair. However, Leung has many public affair. i think if i have to choose, i will choose Tong, he is a good heart bastard. and you can imagine, he do less harm. while Leung is a iron heart bastard, he has no mercy but self-interest. that is what i feel.

Saturday, March 17, 2012

陶傑論貪污

Form 香港雜評


麥理浩的地雷 2012年02月26日 

廉政公署如果要查香港的特首,不但是國際笑話,而且還向每個中國人的臉上搧了一巴掌。 首先,「廉政公署」從何而來?如果不失憶,都知道全名叫「港督特派廉政專員公署」──看到沒有?「港督特派」這四個字,不是僭建,而是這座建築本來結構無敵海景的頂樓。 是哪個港督特派的?是麥理浩勳爵。麥理浩是什麼人?他是出生蘇格蘭、畢業牛津的英國外交部公務員,在六十年代,他一度官至英國外相布朗的秘書。 布朗是工黨首相威爾遜的外相,六十年代,美蘇冷戰很緊張,蘇聯滲透英國的工黨。麥理浩雖然是公務員,但個人氣質傾向工黨──蘇格蘭人,而且在工業城市格拉斯哥出生,麥理浩內心支持工黨是很自然的事。

 一九六七年,麥理浩犯了一件大錯。他把英國首相威爾遜打給美國總統詹森的一份機密電報帶下班,不小心遺忘在一家銀行的櫃枱上。這份電報討論越戰的狀況,是頭等敏感的文件。幸好,銀行在外交部附近,另一個外交官也是銀行顧客,把電報文件撿回來。英國政府大驚,因為美國人早就懷疑威爾遜的工黨政府裏有蘇聯的卧底,下令徹查麥理浩,但威爾遜和布朗,都認為麥理浩是一位忠誠樸實的幹才,丟失機密,純屬無心,叫停調查。 然後,麥理浩調去南越西貢當大使。此時越戰很猛烈,這一年,香港也爆發了共產黨暴動,港督戴麟趾獨力平息。

麥理浩在西貢短短一年多,又轉派英國駐北京代辦處,做了一回丹麥大使,再調來香港。 一來到,發現香港的警察貪污受賄,麥理浩成立廉政公署,把自己的公譽押上去:「港督特派」,意思是:我是上帝,我絕不貪污,專員只給我打電話,你們舉報,不必顧慮層層官僚包庇和威嚇。麥理浩關懷民生疾苦,他是香港中國人的活菩薩,建立區議會,九年免費教育,拆木屋建居屋,留下的許多德政,新加坡模仿,香港在交回主權之後,有的很平庸的人罵英國人「埋地雷」,很好,居屋、免費教育、廉署,都是地雷了,為什麼你當寶貝,死死抱住? 但且慢,看看「廉政公署」,少了「港督特派」,現在真變成了把「中國人民當家作主」的特首炸個稀巴爛的地雷了──麥理浩果然給中國人埋了地雷,長達四十年,今日方爆,這位卓越的殖民家,智商之高,令人讚嘆。

 為什麼麥理浩不貪 2012年02月27日 

麥理浩當年成立的「總督特派廉政專員公署」,這副招牌,設計得很聰明,要點不在「廉政公署」,而在「總督特派」。只有「總督特派」,才畫龍點睛,令廉政公署神速變成信譽可靠的國際品牌。 為什麼加上「總督特派」,香港的中國人有信心?因為港督,是英女皇的特派代表。把英女皇的信譽押下來,人人都會相信,港督直接控制的廉政公署是公正的,因為港督不會貪污。這點,跟中國北大的品牌知識份子孔慶東說:香港人其實並不「崇洋」,香港人只崇優,智商和見識所限,他再投胎十次,也不會懂。 麥理浩是智慧優秀的殖民家。他一早看出來:殖民地的管治,要維持公正,統治者要了解民情,但不可以與殖民地的土著混得太熟而攀上交情。殖民地香港警察,有「四大華探長」,全部是貪污犯,文化基因,不足為奇,但是,連英國的警司葛柏、韓德之流,跟中國的江湖人混在一起,必然受中國社會的貪污文化──為了顧全香港知識份子的學術標準,貪污不是罪惡,是「文化」──污染。 

殖民地時代的文職英官,跟拿槍的英國白人警司不同。葛柏和韓德之類,平時吃潮州菜、打麻將、食牛雜,警署開幕,也裝模作樣學中國人焚香拜關公,不跟「基層」打成一片,收不到黑社會活動的情報,但定力不夠,隨時會「土著化」( Gone native),變成跟他們一個樣。 

殖民主義的真諦,是文化的歧視,土著面前,保持優越感的尊嚴。英文的一句成語:「稔熟會引起鄙視」( Familiarity breeds contempt),麥理浩、衞奕信、尤德、彭定康,絕不跟中國人攀私交,不管你有錢沒錢,召見社會華裔名流,公事公辦。麥理浩有英國牛津的紳士修養,不愛錢,有原則,這一點才是真文化,才是香港的真精神。 中國官場貪污,是永恆的常態。特首是中國人,對不對?這就好辦了。還「出身寒微」呢,真好。「出身寒微」向上爬的中國人,金榜駙馬,一定想過帝皇的豪奢生活,有得貪,一定貪。不錯,以前有一個「君子」的清廉品種,但這個國家經歷過「文革」,沒有了,攀近這個革命唱紅新中國的中國官,一定貪慕享受,你不貪,「國家」絕不會看上你。這是「港人治港」絕不可能成功的生物理由。

 盛情難卻 2012年02月28日 

 從前的港督不會貪小便宜,因為貪污,真是一個文化問題。 中國語文是培養貪污人才的土壤。小孩從小學會這樣的做人道理:「禮多人不怪」、「做事留一線,日後好相見」,還有成語,叫「盛情難卻」、「恭敬不如從命」。 什麼叫「盛情難卻」?為什麼恭敬一定要從命?中國的生活文化,很喜歡勉強人。一桌盛宴,你說夠了,飽了,主人家一定要往你碗裏塞。這就叫「盛情難卻」。主人家按道理應該尊重賓客的意志,他說飽了,就是不要了,但中國的生活文化講「面子」,你拒絕,即是不給面子,就是一場掀桌子的腥風血雨了。 中文的「禮」字雖然古老,「禮記」是禮,「送禮」也是禮。使用這種語文的民族,怎會不貪污行賄呢?明明是黑白分明的不平之事,旁人會勸告你:留一點餘地好,不然將來怎相見呢? 中國人貪污,有許多自我解釋的名句:「人在河邊走,哪能不濕鞋」,在河邊走,只要謹慎,是可以絕對不必濕鞋的,但如果有貪小便宜之心,想到這句古訓,必然心安理得。 人際文化是一種倫理。中國不是一個現代意義的國家( State),三千年來,是無數條村落聚居的一個所在。這個國家以人情和倫理來維繫感情,絕不是以契約和規則來維持法理。香港做了一百五十年英國殖民地,歷史不夠長,香港式的法理,只從英國人手上學到交通燈的紅燈前要停車,層次甚低。領袖的人格和尊嚴,是如何定義,管治的公正和威儀,是如何實踐,由秦始皇開始就一直中了毒,是不會改變的,香港一旦向這種文化主流回歸,也不例外。 當然,中國的一些人會不斷在呼喊「政治改革」。同樣的口號,同樣的理念,他們重複了一百五十年。香港從此會與他們一樣。 記住:下次在飯桌上,不要接受他人的勉強,夾菜、敬酒, No就是 No,沒有「盛情難卻」這回事。告訴他:你接受西方教育,不接受這一套。他再來,你可以拂袖而去。這是你能力內能做到的,社會的其他問題,你不必替他們操心,真可憐呀,由他們繼續盼望下去。

Saturday, March 10, 2012

告別「日本第一」傳奇 大國墜落 高素質人民 縱容出最無能政客與政府

作者: 《遠見雜誌》撰文=梁旅珠 | 遠見雜誌 - 2012年3月8日 下午9:57



台大外文系畢業的梁旅珠,過去十幾年來因為喜愛日本,經常拎著行囊到日本觀光旅行,每年幾乎1/4的時間在日本度過。最後甚至在東京購屋置產,有了一個定居住所。並有二本著作《我和我的那些日本朋友們》、《日本夢幻名宿:溫泉、美食、建築的美好旅行》,描述在日本的見聞與感想。大學畢業後梁旅珠曾主持台灣第一個國際旅遊電視節目「世界真奇妙」(後改名為「繞著地球跑」),後來成為台北市忠孝東路上知名百貨公司明曜百貨創辦人媳婦。而明曜百貨正是日本平價服飾優衣庫(UNIQLO)在台灣的旗艦店。因此她與優衣庫社長柳井正有多次深談機會,了解日本企業領導人對日本未來的憂心忡忡。 在《遠見》雜誌策劃日本311地震一周年之際,特邀梁旅珠撰寫她的日本印象,許多獨家的個人長期觀察,讓人對日本的現況有更深了解。


2011年秋天的京都,意外的不像往年那般擁擠雜沓,有些觀光點甚至像淡季一樣冷清。走在年年排名第一的「紅葉名所」東福寺,難得看到通天橋上依舊擠滿了賞楓人潮,但耳邊只有遊客互喚拍照和保全指揮路線的聲音,卻聽不到過往楓葉季不絕於耳的讚嘆聲:「綺麗?~~紅葉!」

少了日本女人那誇張上揚的軟調詠歎歌頌讚美,去年京都的楓葉季就這麼黯然落幕了。11月底,向來是京都紅葉的高峰期;每年秋冬之際為期兩週的觀光大拜拜,讓和台北差不多大小的京都湧進驚人的觀光潮。但暖秋冷鋒遲遲不來,讓該帶進人潮加錢潮的楓葉無法轉紅,竟逕自在枝頭上焦枯了。


該冷不冷的殘秋熱烘烘,但日本近20年最強冷鋒卻在今年1月底2月初報到(最低溫零下42度),帶來六年以來最大雪量。全國各地因豪雪發生多起交通事故,連名古屋也下大雪,數百台汽車就在路上拋錨,造成交通大打結。


日本全境除了沖繩之外幾乎都在下雪,不少人在剷雪時摔死或被屋頂掉落的積雪擊斃;秋田的玉川溫泉有三人在山中祕湯旅館的岩盤浴帳棚內,被山坡滑落的積雪活活壓死。


日本的社會和經濟現況,就像這一波寒流一樣冷颼颼。持續低迷20年的景氣眼看又將會有第三個十年,而日本也被迫面對中國正式超越,成為全球第二大經濟體的事實。


30年前在東京一碗拉麵要價650日圓,但就在這一兩年,低價連鎖餐廳已經相繼為荷包日薄的上班族,推出了一份290日圓的牛丼或拉麵。更慘的是,去年3月的東北震災和海嘯帶來了前所未有、更不知從何解決的核災,徹底震碎了日本人民對國家的信任和民族自信心。


2011年3月的東北地震後,我曾於6月到東京一趟。使館區和洋人最愛的六本木到麻布十番一帶,以往夜間和週末時滿滿都是洋面孔和外國口音,當時卻全部消失了。一家熟識的TEMPURA店老闆告訴我,地震後有兩個月時間幾乎沒什麼客人,有一天甚至來客數掛零,是他開店幾十年來第一次碰到的情況。而我,則是他三個月來第一次進店的外國客人。

儘管一年後的現在,原本在日工作居住的外國人逐漸回籠,觀光客人數也緩步回升。但日本各地動輒5級以上的地震不斷,連研究機構都頻頻預言關東大地震即將來臨,使得觀光業依舊慘澹。連年不況加上地震核災打擊,即使不是災區的鄉下觀光景點狀況也很糟,商店街凋零頹敗,不少地方政府都快破產了。


  • 日本第一傳奇落幕:產業虧損,政府無能


坐在京都的計程車上,原本不多話的司機聽說我來自台灣,臉上瞬時添了笑意,語氣中多了點親切和放鬆的感覺:「喔,原來台灣和中國都說『中國語』。」問他311震災後,生活和生意有受影響嗎?不料他卻沒頭沒腦的回我一句感慨:「再這樣下去,日本人就快變成中國人的奴僕了!」


日本的計程車司機是站在國家窗口看著外界的一群人。日本人普遍因外語能力不足而怯於接觸外國人,但計程車司機則由於業務需求,即使言語不通,也常被迫載著外國人趴趴走。


尤其在京都這樣的觀光大城,司機每天接觸到的國際觀光客很多,眼界和感受自是與一般從不接觸外來資訊的市井小民不同。他們的年齡層約從40到70歲,正是一生眼睜睜見證國家經濟和運勢從峰頂跌落谷底的一群人;曾經,他們和全世界的人一樣,相信過「日本第一」,以為從此日本將引領世界潮流。


80年代末期,我在美東念研究所時,正是日本站在泡沫頂端,傲視全球不可一世的時代。1988年到1989年,整個華爾街的金融從業人員都得學會拿筷子,把一片片生魚和著醬油和嗆鼻的芥末吞下肚。 那個時候的日本人,天價搶標梵谷名畫,甚至買下紐約的洛克斐勒中心;紐約第五大道的名店從早到晚擠滿了日本觀光客,每一家名店都必須「配備」通曉日語的店員。


當時,夜裡在東京的銀座或六本木街頭喝完酒要回家,必須把好幾張日圓萬元大鈔拿在手上揮舞,才搶得到計程車。現在呢?週末深夜,排班等著要接酒客的計程車多到從中央通八丁目排到四丁目交叉口,還轉彎一路延伸到築地。



  • 全球不景氣加上日圓升值 重創產業


日本的產業有多慘?2月4日出刊的週刊《??????》,就以「再見!傳說的SONY」為封面做了專題報導。消費電子大廠Panasonic狀況也不佳,去年虧損遠高過預期,並預測至今年3月止,全年度虧損可能超過100億美元,將是該公司成立以來最嚴重的年度虧損。


不用學者專家分析,即使不懂經濟的一般民眾,看知名電器賣場BIC CAMERA有樂町店就知道——以往多年來賣場一樓一半以上面積擺的都是電視機,最近一樓原本陳列電視螢幕的地方,已經全部換成了iPhone、iPad和蘋果相關產品。


全球需求減縮和強勢日圓重創日本產業,但日本的中央銀行卻沒有什麼作為。日本央行明明可以大量印鈔讓日幣貶值卻不做,讓中小企業經營艱困;現在又打算追加預算8兆紓困中小企業,繼續增加政府赤字。


對一個年度預算六成要靠借貸的國家來說,真讓人想不通日本政府的心態。 問日本的上班族朋友,他覺得是日本政府抱美國大腿,不敢讓日圓對美金貶值。不過也有人認為,可能是由於社會上的「既得利益者」會因為日幣貶值使得財產大幅縮水,所以不願處置。


整個國家運作墨守成規,更不敢大刀闊斧除弊、拿既得利益者開刀,因而只能和稀泥成一團。既得利益者有誰?就是現今日本握有多數財產的中高齡者,當然包括了領導國家方向的官員政客和專家。


最近的人口研究報告顯示,日本目前有1億2000萬人,但50年後將只剩下8000多萬,而且會變成超高齡社會,超過65歲的人占40%以上。不過多數人想不到未來,因為現在的日本中青年世代日子已經很難熬。


根據估算,現在55歲以下的人,繳付的年金都將超過將來他們能領到手的金額,但儘管如此,多數守法的日本上班族還是乖乖繼續繳。2008經濟危機房產泡沫後,美國許多家庭發現續繳房貸不划算,就兩手一攤把爛帳丟給銀行,日本人卻多半還是認分繳完,等於是付完高額貸款,手中房子的市價卻已經打了好幾折。


日本還有一項更奇怪的「經濟奇蹟」,那就是經濟明明已經慘趴了,失業率卻只有4趴多,跟各國數字相比顯得奇低。日本企業裡有四成是派遣員工,加上打工一族,看似大家有飯吃,實際上很多低薪冗員,有不少人的生活接近赤貧。

  • 社會「格差」化嚴重,年輕人看不到未來

問題是,電視上雖常有節目教導大家如何過極度節約的生活,米其林的星星餐廳卻天天爆滿。過去十幾年,我每年加起來約有1∕4的時間在日本,眼看著社會的「格差」化日益嚴重,不禁感慨,日本的年輕一代,前途和未來不知道在哪裡?

十幾年來,也因為這樣的經濟局勢,造就了日本第一名平價服飾UNIQLO(優衣庫)。自從明曜百貨和UNIQLO敲定設立旗艦店後,我和社長柳井正先生有了幾次見面的機會。2011年6月,我在UNIQLO總公司辦公室,第二次和他會面,趁機請教了他對於日本經濟和社會現況的看法。

當時柳井社長除了直言政客無能是一大禍源,日本年輕人在國際上沒有競爭力的現況,更令他憂心。由於優衣庫正在大舉進軍海外,柳井先生因而有許多機會接觸到來自全球各地剛投入職場的一代。「台灣的年輕人很有活力,也勇於向外發展和挑戰,」他感慨說道:「台灣有很多優秀人才,就像中國、韓國、新加坡一樣;日本的年輕人在工作事業上只求安定、完全沒有冒險精神,他們需要開拓視野,才有辦法跟上世界的腳步。」

去年9月23日優衣庫台北明曜旗艦店開幕當天,我把天下文化出版的新書《放膽去闖》拿給柳井正先生簽名,這是他與大前研一先生合寫給日本年輕人的書。簽名之前,他很慎重的在扉頁寫下「????出?」(走出日本),這是日文的書名,也正是他在書中對日本年輕一代的深深期許。

  • 首相如餐廳定食 每月更換

讀完全書,對柳井社長的序言標題「不能再沉默」感觸很深。日本真的是一個全民沉默且忍耐力十足的國家,不論是地震、事故或停電等任何因素造成地鐵停擺,新聞鏡頭上,只會看到所有無法搭上車的民眾安靜的群集在地鐵票閘口等待,一等數小時,不見爭先恐後,沒有抱怨謾罵。

即使像311震災海嘯如此嚴重的天災過後,日本災民的自制守序也讓全世界大開眼界──沒有爭奪物資,沒有趁火打劫,沒有呼天搶地,也沒有怨東怪西,最多只看到哽咽與拭淚。

但這樣高素質的人民,卻因聽話合作,姑息出一群無能政客與不負責任的企業家。有日本人用「月替定食」(每月替換的特餐)來形容近年頻頻更換的首相,許多人連新上任的首相野田佳彥叫什麼名字也懶得記,只用他曾經拿來自比的「泥鰍」稱呼他。

日本社會的世襲傳統傳子不傳賢,讓當今政界充斥學歷漂亮的公子哥兒,有著體面的家族從政史背景,卻看不到「政治家」的能力、魄力與熱情,最在行的似乎只有料亭密會和上銀座酒家。

而日本龐大企業體制背後,檯面上的企業領導者,像柳井正先生這樣的「資產家」,是真正大股東的並不多。除了股份早被稀釋的創業家族,就是大銀行交叉持股下的專業經理人,在股東分散無實際約束力的現實下,對經營者來說,官商勾結以自保和照顧員工(包括自己在內)的福利,往往比獲利還重要。因此日本的大商社,普遍沒有歐美企業的競爭進取活力,反而常有著類似共產主義的經營心態與模式

  • 看似國際化,實則封閉、僵化、無效率

我相信很多人跟我一樣,看著日本官僚和東電高層面對核災的應對無能,看著大王製紙和OLYMPUS這類大企業經營者的胡作非為,一定感到不解——日本民眾的聲音在哪裡?媒體究竟有沒有正義與批判的能力?日本到底有沒有心懷社會責任感的領袖人物?

生活苦哈哈的人民期待改革,這一點,從去年底大阪巿長選舉可看出端倪。年輕的改革派前大阪府知事橋下徹,在執政和在野三黨聯手全面夾殺下,仍高票擊退尋求連任的前市長平松邦夫。

律師出身、言談犀利大膽的橋下不僅受年輕一代支持,也擁有不少中老年巿井小民和婆婆媽媽粉絲。最近有白天的談話節目在大阪街頭訪問40歲以上的人:「有困擾時最希望能向哪一位名人請教?」橋下名列第三,位於兩位知名藝人之後,是少數受到民眾信任喜愛的政治人物。如今的大阪府知事是橋下的心腹,關西政經中心大阪已成為橋下幫的天下。除了繼續進行他整合大阪府與大阪市為「大阪都」的計畫,表現積極的橋下正在推動總理民選,意圖打破日本官僚體系的積習和沈?,而他本身也是最有實力問鼎中央的明日之星。

  • 忍無可忍 年輕人該走出日本

橋下領導的「大阪維新會」將於今年3月舉辦「維新政治塾」,以「改變大阪,日本就會改變」為號召,仿?本龍馬提出橋下版的「船中八策」,著手包括資產課稅和教育制度的改革,為整頓政府財政,更毫不留情的打算裁掉連續考績不佳的教員。此舉雖引起教育界反彈,卻受到多數民眾歡迎。他表示,日本島國領土狹小資源有限,唯有透過良好的「教育」,培養日本年輕一代的視野與競爭力,日本的未來才有希望。

因為「忍無可忍」,政壇終於出現了改革派新星;更因為「不得不說」,民間總算有像柳井社長和大前先生這樣的人發聲了。問題是,儘管他們一再呼籲:「日本已成三流國家,你們不能死守這裡,必須出去外面看看!」但當下的年輕族群,真正接收到這個訊息的人,比例上似乎很少。 雖然電視節目有很多深入淺出的解說,告訴年輕人他們未來一輩子要面對的,不光是必須供養快速老化的龐大人口,還有滾雪球般的天文財政赤字,但多數人並沒有危機意識。 雖然嘴裡說著現在的政治人物無法信任,一般民眾還是覺得這些「國家大事」離自己的生活太遠,不關心也不想了解,天真的認為國家政府終究會負責解決。

他們無法想像,存在銀行裡帳面上的100萬,其實早被政府借去花掉了70萬;他們也無法相信,每個月乖乖在繳的年金,這一輩退休者只是延遲領取年紀,將來可能根本拿不到。日本人多半是上班族,認為匯率是財務相關人員或社長級以上的人才需要關心的事,因而當日幣飆高,年輕人第一個反應只有衝出國去度假,或是跑到便宜國家瞎拚。

  • 社會封閉 外人融入難上加難

一位在日本工作20年的朋友說,當年負笈東瀛留學,以為日本是個多麼國際化的地方,如今才知道日本人被國家照顧得太好,國際化程度其實很差。常到日本遊玩的人應該可以感受到,如果不會講一點日文,即使在首善之都東京,連在觀光點用英文,碰壁的機率還是很高。

這些年我偶而會見到英文相當流利的日本人,但幾乎都是歸國日僑或在外遊學多年的年輕人,光靠國內的外語學習,鮮少有人有勇氣開口應對。加上日本文化規矩禁忌很多,一切有他們自己的遊戲規則,形成各類大大小小的封閉圈,外國人想要打進融入日本人的生活,真的是難上加難

關於這一點,最近台灣的媒體應該頗有感觸。為了東京兩位台灣女留學生的命案,大批台灣媒體蜂擁至東京採訪,卻發現必須是日本警視廳「記者俱樂部」的會員,才有資格參加警方舉行的記者會,而日本各省廳幾乎都有各自的記者俱樂部。

其實,當311震災後,台灣民眾一片頌揚日本媒體的「自律能力」背後,正是因為爭鳴扒糞少,媒體與各界高層長期的「尊重友好」與利益瓜分下,姑息養奸的情況並不罕見,非主流的聲音也很難被聽到

日本井然有序的社會,建構在一種綿密而相互約束層層關係潛規則上,那就是:認同團體、互助合作、長幼有序、上層負責。

  • 全民「我慢」,國家機器疲態、醜態畢露

如何確保資源共享和社會安寧?聽上級的話,排隊就是了。大家照著年資排,總有一天輪到你;不合群強出頭的人,一定會被排擠打壓。對年輕人來說,最安全的人生正道就是進大公司,領薪水,排隊一輩子,看能否升到部長再退休。聽話和上層負責,成了日本社會僵化與無效率的元凶。

於是,擠進一流大學不是想要學習專業知識能力,而是為了拿到進入大企業的「入門通行證」,並建立學長學弟的關係,期望在畢業前由學長拉拔內定為大企業的員工。

  • 大學生不進修只求儘快卡位大公司

為了爭取年資及早卡位,日本大學生並不流行出國進修,因為留學回來求職不見得加分,反而在進公司的時序年資上很吃虧。反正進了公司之後,一切從頭學起,一階一階排隊爬樓梯的漫漫人生將延續到退休,在學校學到什麼並不重要,因而形成了日本許多名校大學生終日玩樂酗酒的怪現象。

日本的考試制度,也極度欠缺效率與不合理,至今各大學還是個別招生考試,所以一個高中畢業生,為不同大學連考十幾個入學考試是稀鬆平常的事。也因為個別招考,不但各校不同,公立大學系統和私立大學考試科目內容也不一樣,所以一般考生只能選其中一個方向,否則連補習都不知該怎麼補。

多數家長很難掌握繁雜的考試內容、日期和選校策略,因而給了各類「塾」(補習班)很大的生存和利潤空間。家裡經濟狀況不允許的孩子,先不考慮學費,多半連報考私立大學都有困難。舉例來說,私立大學每考一個學部就要繳約3萬日圓的報考費,一個高中畢業生若計畫考三個私立大學共十個學部的話,光報名參加考試就要繳30萬,這還不包括一年動輒數百萬的補習費。

教育制度腐化嚴重損害國力 因為個別招生考試,選校失當的話可能落到無校可讀,所以在日本一再重考的狀況相當普遍,針對重考次數還有「 一浪」「二浪」「三浪」這樣的專有名詞。

名校一定最後考,先考的學校先放榜,已錄取但沒有把握考得上前幾志願的學生,只好繳高額費用保住名額,而這筆錢是無法退還的。 在我這個「外人」眼裡,這些制度怎麼看都像是各校互相保障收入利益的暗默共識,光想到整個社會浪費在這上面的時間、人力、物力與金錢,要是在其他國家,而不是在全民「我慢」(忍耐)的日本,教育當局若不想辦法改革整合,早就被罵翻了

日本的考季在每年的1~3月,4月入學,與其他國家的教育系統不同,想出國留學在銜接上的確有困難,因此近來東京大學已在研擬要將入學時間改為秋天,與世界接軌,以強化日本年輕一代人才的國際競爭力。

日本政府也深切感受到陳腐的教育制度嚴重弱化國力,野田首相在1月25日的國家戰略會議中表示,東大的計畫是領導全面修正現行考試制度的大好機會,希望能廣納產業界的意見進行改革。雖然根據日本經濟新聞社針對22家名校的問卷調查,回覆的18家中有16家表示有意跟進,不過日本社會對改革一向僵固牛步,這項已討論多時的改革計畫,還不知道哪年哪月才能全面實現。

全世界正以前所未有的加速度劇變中,面對變化,笨重的國家機器疲態、醜態畢露。人們在2008年學到的教訓是:世界上沒有什麼「大公司」不會倒。2012年,我們可能會學到的教訓是:世界上沒有什麼「大國家」不會倒!

Thursday, January 19, 2012

being late

"if 10 mins late is late, so be it"

yes, i always not in time. it is because i have no control of time. moreover, i care my time, more than others's time. people can name a lot of reasons that you should not be late. that's OK. just like people have a lot of reasons to believe in god. just a point of view.

now, what i want to say is, the reasons for being late.

first, the price for being on time is huge, especially for those who define "late" is within 10 mins. why? i found that, to be on time, we usually, and actually, have to arrive earlier. i don't know anyone who can always exactly ON time, within 1 min. they spent many time for waiting to be on time.

2nd, there is always accident, say, the last meeting was prolonged. traffic jam, stomach rush, etc. so, who can guarantee that? to be 10 mins, 20 mins late is acceptable. by the way, now we can tell people about our accident. but even in some condition that no communication is possible. i think it is fine. my world will not stop for you. i can do many things.

3rd, i believe, people being late must have their reason. say, over sleep, have other business, etc. you don't know and cannot assume that he/she being late is that he/she mean to do it. some people even take it very personal that he/she was dis-respected. i think it is too crazy and self-centered.

4th, if we forcing people be on time, in his/her standard, i think that does not help anything, it simple create a pressure. (oh, some people use it to build up authority, that they think it works) a 70% wake up people do more harm than contribution. that i don't want.

5th, something people may think that, being late is not taking the thing seriously. i want to know, on what earth that being on time mean seriously?? and on what reason that doing a good job is strictly related to time??

by the way, we all knew that being on-time is not a pressure, not an enjoyment. why we have to forcing ourselves and other to be on-time??

at the end, i am not encourage people to be late. i just want to say, 10 to 20 mins late is acceptable. of course, there are many cases that, being late will be disqualify. say, in Olympic game. in some situation. but that are well-known. what i mean is, unless you mentioned being late will be disqualify,  you should be blame, and no right to blame people who being late.

Monday, January 09, 2012

beyond bipolar

i still remember in a primary philosophy book, Francis Bacon said something like, " by solving any contradiction, a new idea or theory will be formed. ".

in other word, in order to solve a contradiction, we need something new, somewhat a bigger picture. 

for example, a common question on " if egg first, or chicken first. " we knew, that , there can not be both first by definition. and there "must" be something happen first, by instinct. after many years of biology advancement, now, scientist knew that, in some sense, egg (a general egg) comes first, while in other sense, chicken (a general animal ) comes first. This is based on genetic study and evolution. 

another example may be "when observation is not fit theory". it seems that there is no contradiction at all, eventually, the observation is the truth, while theory is just a description. However, when a theory was confirmed by many many observations while suddenly a new experiment violate the theory, then it is a big deal. as the recent "hyper-speed neutrino".   

in order to solve a contradiction or a conflict in general, the easiest way is choose a side. that means, against another. a trivial example is "believer of Bible" and "Believer of  Koran". or " free-market and small government" vs "regulated market and big-government". 

but there is a third choice, or even fourth. 

the bipolar and beyond


the third one is comparatively easy. this is nothing new but "depend on given conditions". i think HK A-Level students are well trained on this option. say, "should or should not take drug/ medicine  for exam? " then, students are typically say, it depends. if you are sick, then it is ok, since it help to to perform as you are. etc, bra, bra bra... this option is simple cut the question in small piece, and see how each piece fit the principle. or how each piece fit in each principle. it is somewhat a considerate option, which take care of each different situation, but it is kind of flexible that there seem to be no principle.

the 4th choice is, having a bigger picture, that cover and see what make the conflict or contradiction happen?  this is hard. not everyone can have. it require penetration of the problem. this is what i called "beyond bipolar". say, "believer" and "not-believer". and there is "non-believer". i think i had talked the difference between these 3 .  

one last thing i like to mention is, the John Rawls's theory and Milton Friedman's theory on economy. or simple communism and capitalism. but the later two is too broad, so broaden that beyond my ability. Rawls said, since everything we have is basically, not by ourselves, our wealth, our ability, our handsomeness, etc... so, we should not value people on their ability, but share the wealth. while Friedman given an example, that, in an imaginary world, John can make 2 cakes an hour and Sam can only make 1 cake, in what reason, John have to share a cake with Sam? by humanity? in my extension, if an alien comes to earth, shall we share our resources with them? if some stranger come to my home, shall i share my food to him? why? in an extreme case, since your prefect body is not by yourself, why don't you share and have sex with everyone? 

personally, i am ok with "share a cake with sam, since you 2 are friends or John feel pity that Sam always hungry", but not "we have to set up a law, to force John to share with Sam." that is i am strongly against, that is absolutely cross the line, the line of freedom. 

however, Fridmann's theory of freedom can possibly general a cruel world that the rich has no sympathy toward the poor. that is also i don't like, nevertheless, we are human, not animal. 

so, is there a way out? to beyond these 2 theories? may be, that is what happening in this real world. 

that, rich can have no sympathy, but the government should, and the matter is, how far this sympathy should stop. where is the line? and how the line move when the society change? 

say, the MPF, the Mandatory Provident Fund, in HK. it try to ensure old people welfare. but i think that, this is an example of good intention, suck method. why and how suck it is? i think i already mentioned somewhere.

Saturday, January 07, 2012

When Data does not fit the theory

a friend asked me, what i will do, when the data does not fit the theory. i never though of this problem, just like never think how to walk. but this is a good question. so i made this chart, hope helpful. the error part can be fill numbers of books, so, that was skipped.